Misquoting Jesus Podcast
Paul's Bizarre Views on Salvation: Exploring the Apostle's Contradictory Explanations
Show notes
Episode Outline:
- Introduction: Paul’s many views of salvation
- Where Paul explains salvation in the New Testament
- Why “saved” means something future for Paul
- The judicial model of salvation
- What the resurrection proves in the judicial model
- The participationist model of salvation
- Baptism, union with Christ, and liberation from sin
- Paul’s other models: reconciliation, redemption, and justification
Episode Description:
The question of how Jesus’ death and resurrection save humanity has stumped Christians—and scholars—for centuries. But for the Apostle Paul, it was not just a matter of faith, but of explanation—and he offers several, often using the same terms for very different concepts.
This episode of Misquoting Jesus with Bart Ehrman (Episode 145) dives into the heart of Paul’s thought, exploring:
- The two primary “models” of salvation—what they are, how they work, and why Paul mixes them up in his writing
- Why Paul never claims anyone has been "saved" yet, and what that means for Christian doctrine
- How baptism, faith, and the cosmic power of sin all play different roles depending on which model Paul uses
- Where to find Paul’s clearest statements about salvation in the New Testament (hint: Romans is pivotal)
- What all this means for modern Christian beliefs—and why these differences still matter today
Summary of the Discussion:
Megan Lewis kicks off by noting how surprisingly confusing Paul’s theology of salvation can be. Bart Ehrman explains that Paul both presupposes and alludes to his ideas in his letters, but Romans is the letter where Paul lays out his view most systematically—because he’s writing to Christians in Rome who don’t know him personally.
The conversation then delves into the multiple models or metaphors Paul uses to describe how Jesus’ death and resurrection bring salvation:
1. The Judicial Model:
Paul describes God as a lawgiver and judge, with humans as defendants who have broken divine laws. The penalty is death, but Jesus’ sacrificial death pays this penalty for others, allowing them to be “justified.” Faith, in this model, isn’t just believing facts—it’s trusting that the payment applies to you.
2. The Participationist Model:
Much less familiar to most Christians, this model sees sin not merely as individual acts, but as a cosmic power—a force that enslaves humanity. Here, Jesus’ death defeats the power of sin (and death) itself. Through baptism, believers “participate” mystically in Christ’s victory, being joined to him in his death (and one day resurrection). Baptism, rather than simply showing faith, is the act that unites believers with Christ’s triumph.
Integration and Language:
While Paul shifts between these and uses overlapping language (especially “sin”), each model operates with different assumptions. Ehrman clarifies that Paul doesn’t see them as just separate options—you don’t choose one or the other. Instead, he weaves them together, often in the same letters. Variations include reconciliation (restoring a broken relationship), redemption (being bought back), and others.
Three Key Takeaways
- Paul did not have a single doctrine of salvation—he interwove several, especially the judicial (legal/penal) and participationist (cosmic/mystical) models.
- Paul’s understanding of baptism is radically different from most modern Christian denominations—it’s not just symbolic, but the very act of uniting with Christ’s victory over sin and death.
- To truly understand Paul’s letters (especially Romans), readers must pay attention to when he changes the meaning of key words like “sin” and the logic of salvation. Modern assumptions about “being saved” or “faith” may miss Paul’s nuance.
Also watch these episodes:
Sin, Death, and Salvation: Paul's Mysterious View
Sin, Death, and Salvation: Paul’s Mysterious View
Bart Unplugged: Rapid-Fire Answers about Apostle Paul
Bart Unplugged: Rapid-Fire Answers on the Apostle Paul
Is Paul the Founder of Christianity?
Is Paul the Founder of Christianity?
- Introduction: Paul’s many views of salvation
- Where Paul explains salvation in the New Testament
- Why “saved” means something future for Paul
- The judicial model of salvation
- What the resurrection proves in the judicial model
- The participationist model of salvation
- Baptism, union with Christ, and liberation from sin
- Paul’s other models: reconciliation, redemption, and justification
Episode Description:
The question of how Jesus’ death and resurrection save humanity has stumped Christians—and scholars—for centuries. But for the Apostle Paul, it was not just a matter of faith, but of explanation—and he offers several, often using the same terms for very different concepts.
This episode of Misquoting Jesus with Bart Ehrman (Episode 145) dives into the heart of Paul’s thought, exploring:
- The two primary “models” of salvation—what they are, how they work, and why Paul mixes them up in his writing
- Why Paul never claims anyone has been "saved" yet, and what that means for Christian doctrine
- How baptism, faith, and the cosmic power of sin all play different roles depending on which model Paul uses
- Where to find Paul’s clearest statements about salvation in the New Testament (hint: Romans is pivotal)
- What all this means for modern Christian beliefs—and why these differences still matter today
Summary of the Discussion:
Megan Lewis kicks off by noting how surprisingly confusing Paul’s theology of salvation can be. Bart Ehrman explains that Paul both presupposes and alludes to his ideas in his letters, but Romans is the letter where Paul lays out his view most systematically—because he’s writing to Christians in Rome who don’t know him personally.
The conversation then delves into the multiple models or metaphors Paul uses to describe how Jesus’ death and resurrection bring salvation:
1. The Judicial Model:
Paul describes God as a lawgiver and judge, with humans as defendants who have broken divine laws. The penalty is death, but Jesus’ sacrificial death pays this penalty for others, allowing them to be “justified.” Faith, in this model, isn’t just believing facts—it’s trusting that the payment applies to you.
2. The Participationist Model:
Much less familiar to most Christians, this model sees sin not merely as individual acts, but as a cosmic power—a force that enslaves humanity. Here, Jesus’ death defeats the power of sin (and death) itself. Through baptism, believers “participate” mystically in Christ’s victory, being joined to him in his death (and one day resurrection). Baptism, rather than simply showing faith, is the act that unites believers with Christ’s triumph.
Integration and Language:
While Paul shifts between these and uses overlapping language (especially “sin”), each model operates with different assumptions. Ehrman clarifies that Paul doesn’t see them as just separate options—you don’t choose one or the other. Instead, he weaves them together, often in the same letters. Variations include reconciliation (restoring a broken relationship), redemption (being bought back), and others.
Three Key Takeaways
- Paul did not have a single doctrine of salvation—he interwove several, especially the judicial (legal/penal) and participationist (cosmic/mystical) models.
- Paul’s understanding of baptism is radically different from most modern Christian denominations—it’s not just symbolic, but the very act of uniting with Christ’s victory over sin and death.
- To truly understand Paul’s letters (especially Romans), readers must pay attention to when he changes the meaning of key words like “sin” and the logic of salvation. Modern assumptions about “being saved” or “faith” may miss Paul’s nuance.
Also watch these episodes:
Sin, Death, and Salvation: Paul's Mysterious View
Sin, Death, and Salvation: Paul’s Mysterious View
Bart Unplugged: Rapid-Fire Answers about Apostle Paul
Bart Unplugged: Rapid-Fire Answers on the Apostle Paul
Is Paul the Founder of Christianity?
Is Paul the Founder of Christianity?
Go deeper on this topic
Online course
Paul and Jesus: The Great Divide
The two most important figures in the entire history of Christianity were Jesus himself and his later follower, the apostle Paul. But how closely related were they? Did…
Free courseFree
Did Peter Hate Paul?
A free two-lecture course on the clash between Christianity’s two giants.
Related episodes
Podcast
Sin, Death, and Salvation: Paul’s Mysterious View
Podcast
Paul and Jesus at Odds
Podcast
Does Paul Think God Hates Jews?
Read next
Article
The Historical Paul: 10 Facts That Even Atheist Skeptics Agree On
Article
Soteriology: Exploring the Study of Salvation in the Bible
Find your path New to paul & early christianity? Two quick questions build you a personal route: free lectures, current articles and episodes, and the right course for your level.
Build my path →
All episodes →